非法证据对法官心证的影响及对策研究——以案件移送制度为视角  

Impact of Illegal Obtained Evidence on Judge's Mental Impression From the Perspective of Case Transfer System

作　　者：高杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学法学院,北京100038

出　　处：《鸡西大学学报（综合版）》2015年第11期90-92,4,共3页JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition

摘　　要：2012年新刑诉法恢复了庭前移送案卷制度,使得庭审法官在庭前已经接触到了包括非法证据在内的所有证据,而证据的合法性问题和案件事实问题在我国是由同一审判庭进行审理的,使得非法证据对庭审法官心证形成的污染一直持续到后期整个庭审过程。所以,在现行的法律制度下,就案件中的非法证据排除问题单独交由上一级法院进行审理,切断非法证据与案件事实庭审法官的联系,是防止庭审法官"心证"受到污染的良策,即非法证据排除问题最低一级的审理法院为中级人民法院。The new Criminal Procedure Law restored the pre-trial files transfer system, so that the trial judge has been ex-posed to all the evidence before the court trial , including illegal evidence.As the legality of the evidence and the facts of the case in question is trialed by the same adjudication division , the pollution of illegal evidence on the trial judge would be continued until the latter part of the whole process of the trial.Therefore, under the existing legal system, the exclusion of illegal evidence should be delivered to the higher court for trial in order to cut off the connection between the illegal evidence and case trial judge and to prevent the problem of judge＇s mental impression influenced by the illegal evidence.

关 键 词：非法证据排除 案卷移送主义 法官心证 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]