主权理论革新与国家人格否认制度之同构  

Isomorphism between Sovereignty Theories' Innovation and National Personality Denial System

作　　者：刘学文[1] 朱京安[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学,天津300350

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2015年第11期10-19,共10页Pacific Journal

基　　金：国家人权教育与培训基地项目"联合国工商业与人权指导原则框架下的企业人权责任研究"(14JJD820004)的资助

摘　　要：国家人格否认制度的理论构建引出新时期主权理论的界定问题。若坚持绝对主权论,则该制度对国家主权形成侵害,这与战后国际法倡导的"个人刑事责任原则"背道而驰;而主权过时论又有可能引起人权大于主权的"新干涉主义"弊端。所以,主权理论在新时期应作新的审视和解读,各国只有通过协商一致进行主权适当让渡才能使国际法有存留和发展之空间,从而使国家主权权力的行使亦受到国际权力的限制,以更好地保障各国的国家权利。"晚期现代主权论"的核心理念则正好证成了国家人格否认制度的正当性,同时也进一步反证了在国际社会中倡导"晚期现代主权论"的重要性和紧迫性,两者逐步实现了理论上的自洽。The theory-building of National Personality Denial System gives rise to definition of sovereignty theory in the new era.If we insist on doctrine of absolute sovereignty,the institution denial of national per-sonality can be viewed as violation to sovereignty of a country,and it is inconsistent with “individual crimi-nal responsibility”established after WWⅡ;On the contrary,the theory of the out-of-date state sovereignty may cause new interventionism that advocating human rights prior to the sovereignty.Obviously,the sover-eignty theory should be reviewed and interpreted in the new era.Only Countries propel sovereignty deni-ability through consultation,can international law be put forth;therefore,the exercise of sovereign power has to be subject to the conditions of international power to protect state rights preferably.And the core con-notation of “Late-Modern Sovereignty”just proves that National Personality Denial System is legitimate and urgent,and the both gradually achieve the self-consistency in theory.

关 键 词：国家人格否认制度 国家主权 人权 晚期现代主权论 国家权利 国际权力 

分 类 号：D990[政治法律—国际法学]