水囊扩张和欣普贝生在41周妊娠引产中的效果对比研究  

Comparative Study on the Effect of Balloon Dilatation and Propess at 41 Weeks Gestation Induced Labor

作　　者：陈颖 

机构地区：[1]厦门第三医院,福建厦门361100

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2015年第32期3-5,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

摘　　要：目的:研究分析水囊扩张和欣普贝生在41周妊娠引产中的效果对比。方法:选取2014年8月-2015年6月笔者所在医院收治的100例41周妊娠引产孕妇,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,各50例。观察组实施水囊扩张引产,对照组使用欣普贝生引产,对比两组孕妇引产后的效果。结果:实施引产后,两组的引产效果、阴道分娩率、剖宫产率、引产至分娩时间、分娩时长、总产程时间对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:水囊扩张和欣普贝生在41周妊娠引产中,均具有安全、可靠的疗效,但在引产效果、阴道分娩方面水囊扩张优于欣普贝生,而在引产至分娩时间、分娩时长、总产程时间方面欣普贝生优于水囊扩张,因此在选用引产方式时,应根据孕妇实际情况来选择较佳的引产方式。Objective： Contrast research and analysis on the efficacy of balloon dilatation and propess at 41 weeks gestation induced labor. Method： 100 pregnant women with 41 weeks gestation induced labor in our hospital from August 2014 to June 2015 were selected , they were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, 50 cases in each group.The observation group was given balloon dilatation, the control group was used propess induced labor.The effect of pregnant women after induced labor were compared of the two groups.Result： After the induced labor, the effect of induced labor, the rate of vaginal delivery, cesarean section rate, labor to delivery time, time of delivery, total process time were compared of the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences （P〉0.05）.Conclusion： Balloon dilatation and propess in induced labor at 41 weeks, all have a safe, reliable effect, but the effect in the induction of labor, vaginal delivery is better than propess aspects of balloon dilatation, and in labor to delivery time, time of delivery, the total labor time aspect propess is better than balloon dilatation, so the choice of induced labor mode, should be based on the actual situation of pregnant women to choose induced labor preferred way.

关 键 词：水囊扩张 欣普贝生 41周引产 效果 

分 类 号：R719.3[医药卫生—妇产科学]