检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院内镜室,150000
出 处:《国际护理学杂志》2015年第20期2748-2752,共5页international journal of nursing
摘 要:目的探讨综合护理干预对胃镜检查患者的情绪血压的影响,为提高检查效果及减少并发症提供依据。方法选择2012年10-12月在本院行胃镜检查的患者240例,随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组在检查前及检查中采用综合护理,对照组只给予常规护理。比较两组患者的焦虑状况、血压变化及一次性进镜的成功率与并发症。结果观察组的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)与心率(HR)在检查前都比对照组低,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);检查中两组SBP与HR两组差异非常明显(P〈0.01),DBP差异明显(P〈0.05);检查后SBP、HR两组差异有意义(P〈0.05),DBP两组差异无意义(P〉0.05)。检查前后SAS评分观察组的焦虑程度比对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组的一次进镜成功率比对照组高(P〈0.05);两组的耐受程度中良好与一般的差异非常明显(P〈0.01),耐受差异有意义(P〈0.05);并发症中咽部擦伤差异非常明显(P〈0.01),喉头痉挛差异有意义(P〈0.05)。结论对胃镜检查患者进行综合护理干预可有效改善患者焦虑、使情绪与血压平稳、并能提高一次进镜成功率及减少并发症的发生。Objective To explore the impact of comprehensive nursing intervention on the emotion and blood pressure of the gastroscopy, provide the basis for improving inspection effect and reducing complications. Methods 240 patients in our hospital from 2012-10 to 2012-12 were divided into observation group and control group randomlyl Patients in observation group were given comprehensive nursing intervention before the examination and checking, in control group were treated with conventional inspection methods. Anxiety status, changes of blood pressure, the success rate of once into the mirror and complications were compared. Results The systolic blood pressure (SBP) , diastolic blood pressure (DBP) , heart rate (HR) of observation group were all lower than those of control group before checking, but there were no significant differences (P〉0. 05) . There were significant differences in SBP, HR and DBP between two groups in checking (P〈0.01, P〈0. 05) . There were significant differences in SBP and HR between two groups after checking (P〈0. 05 ), there was no significant difference in DBP between two groups ( P〉0. 05 ) after checking. There was significant difference in SAS score between two groups (P〈0. 05). Once into the mirror of observation group was higher than that of control group ( P〈0. 05 ) . There were significant differences in good and general degree of the tolerance between two groups ( P〈0. 01 ) There were significant differences in throat damage and laryngismus between two groups (P〈0. 01, P〈0. 05 ) . Conclusion To give care intervention in the course of gastroscopy can significantly alleviate the patient anxiety, help emotions and blood pressure stabling, improve success rate of once into the mirror and reduce complication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117