WTO规则下的不公平贸易战——WTO成立20周年之全球反倾销案件分析及中国的策略选择  

Unfair Trade Wars under the WTO Rules: Global Anti-dumping Case Analysis and China Strategic Choices at the 20^(th) Anniversary of WTO

作　　者：尹继元[1] 李淑玲[2] 

机构地区：[1]江苏经贸职业技术学院,江苏南京211168 [2]对外经济贸易大学,北京100029

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2015年第11期56-72,共17页International Economics and Trade Research

基　　金：江苏经贸职业技术学院重大课题(项目:JSJM1406)

摘　　要：文章运用WTO公布的最新数据,对1995~2014年20年间的全球反倾销案件进行了分析;研究了美国、欧盟、印度和中国四个主要经济体的反倾销的发起和应诉情况;并重点分析了中美两国反倾销策略的博弈。研究表明,不公平的贸易战在发达国家之间、发展中国家之间以及发达国家和发展中国家之间均频繁发生;贸易保护主义现象并没有因为WTO的存在而减少,各国纷纷依据自己的法律标准发起和裁定反倾销案件;中国是遭受反倾销损害最大的国家,却很少采取针锋相对的反倾销策略,因此必须对我国传统的反倾销战略进行改革。中国应积极参与反倾销俱乐部,推动反倾销协议的改革;同时,中国政府应给予本国企业反倾销方面的援助,积极运用反倾销法律工具保护自身利益。Based on the newest data from WTO, this paper analyzes the global anti-dumping cases during 1995-2014, and studies the anti-dumping initiating and responding situations of the four main economies of US, EU, India and China, and the anti-dumping game between the US and China. The research shows that, unfair trade wars happen frequently among developed countries, between developing countries, and between developed and developing countries. Trade protectrism does not decrease because of the existance of WTO, and each country uses the legal standard of itself to initiate and rule on anti-dumping cases. Among all the countries, China is the one that is injured most, but seldom uses the anti-dumping strategy as a revengeful tool. So, China should reform its anti-dumping strategy. China should participate the anti-dumping clubs, and push the reform of anti-dumping agreements. And at the same time, Chinese government should offer assitance for enterprises involving in anti-dumping suits, and actively utilize anti-dumping legal tools to protect its benefits.

关 键 词：WTO规则 不公平贸易战 反倾销案件 策略建议 

分 类 号：F741.23[经济管理—国际贸易]