检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西中医学院
出 处:《山西中医》2015年第11期33-34,共2页Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:十二五科技支撑项目(编号:2013BA105B08)
摘 要:目的:观察穴位埋线疗法治疗过敏性哮喘的临床疗效。方法:选取门诊过敏性哮喘患者80例,随机分为治疗组和对照组各40例。治疗组采用穴位埋线法,对照组采用普通针刺法,比较两组的治疗效果。结果:治疗组总有效率87.5%,对照组总有效率67.5%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05),提示治疗组显著优于对照组。结论:穴位埋线疗法通过"以线代针"的长效刺激,疗效优于普通针刺疗法。To evaluate the clinical efficacy of allergic asthma treated by catgut implantation at acupoint. Methods: 80 clinicbased patients with allergic asthma were selected and randomized to treatment group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The treatment group were treated by catgut implantation at acupoint, while the control group were treated by acupuncture. The therapeutic effects of two groups were compared. Results : The total effective rate of the treatment group was 87.5% (35/40), while the control group was 67.5% (27/40), the difference between the two groups was significant (P 〈 0.05) , which suggested that the treatment group was significantly better than the control group. Conclusion: By using line instead of needle, catgut implantation at acupoint have a long-term stimulation which can avoid local acupuncture causing adverse reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.73.81