整体平衡疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察  

Therapeutic Observation of General Balance Therapy for Cervical Spondylosis of Nerve Root Type

作　　者：邹来勇[1] 涂国卿[1] 朱玉辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西中医药高等专科学校,抚州344000

出　　处：《上海针灸杂志》2015年第11期1099-1101,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion

基　　金：江西省卫生厅中医药科研基金项目(2011A011)

摘　　要：目的观察整体平衡疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法将120例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组60例。治疗组采用整体平衡疗法(平衡针刺配合平衡推拿)治疗,对照组采用常规针刺配合推拿治疗。观察两组治疗前后颈部活动度各项指标,并比较两组临床疗效。结果两组治疗后颈部活动度各项指标(颈部前屈、颈部后伸、侧屈度及旋转角度)与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后颈部活动度各项指标与对照组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组总有效率为95.0%,对照组为85.0%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论整体平衡疗法是一种治疗神经根型颈椎病的有效方法。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of general balance therapy in treating cervical spondylosis of nerve root type.Method Totally 120 patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 60 cases in each group. The treatment group was intervened by general balance therapy （balance needling plus balance tuina manipulations）, while the control group was by ordinary acupuncture and tuina manipulations. The cervical movement ranges were observed before and after the treatment, and the clinical efficacies were compared between the two groups. Result The cervical movement ranges （forward flexion, backward extension, lateral flexion, and turning range） were significantly changed in both groups after the treatment （P〈0.05）. The cervical movement ranges of the treatment group were significantly different from that of the control group （P〈0.05）. The total effective rate was 95.0% in the treatment group versus 85.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.01）.Conclusion General balance therapy is an effective method in treating cervical spondylosis of nerve root type.

关 键 词：针刺疗法 缪刺 颈椎病 神经根型 推拿 穴 液门 

分 类 号：R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]