检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国石油大学(华东)重质油加工国家重点实验,山东青岛266580
出 处:《广东化工》2015年第22期25-26,共2页Guangdong Chemical Industry
摘 要:用实测的伊朗原油24组馏分油的部分物性数据,考察了常用的估算临界性质的七个估算式应用于伊朗原油的适用性,结果表明:估算临界温度的四个计算式的平均相对偏差在1.25%~2.21%之间,其中Sim-Daubert式、Lee-Kesler式和Cavett式的偏差分别是1.25%、1.43%和1.46%,优于Roess式的2.21%。Roess式、Sim-Daubert式和Lee-Kesler式以及Cavett式均可满足工艺计算临界温度的要求。估算临界压力的三个计算式中,Sim-Daubert估算式、Lee-Kesler估算式和Cavett式的平均相对偏差分别为2.31%、6.67%和7.12%,标准偏差分别为为0.109MPa、0.149 MPa和0.142 MPa,Sim-Daubert估算式可以满足工程计算的要求。Some properties of 24 wide and narrow fractions from lran crude were determined. On the basis of experimental data available, seven empirical correlation equations tbr estimating critical temperature and pressure generally were evaluated. As a result of this investigation, it was concluded that the Sim-Daubert procedure (eq. 5) was the most accurate for critical temperature calculation, having an average relation error of 1.25 % as compared to 1.43 % for the Lee-Kesler method(eq. 6) and 1.46 % for the Cavett (eq. 7) and 2.22 % for the Roess method(eq. 4). And another result of this investigation was that Sim-Daubert method(eq. 1) was more accurate for critical pressure calculation, having an average relation error of 2.31% as compared to 6.67 % for Lee-Kesler procedure(eq. 2) and 7.12 % for Cavett method(eq. 3).
分 类 号:TE622.5[石油与天然气工程—油气加工工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28