基于DEA-ESDA的皖江城市带城市效率评价  

Urban Efficiency Evaluation of Wanjiang City Belt Based on DEA-ESDA

作　　者：陈晓华[1,2] 李久林[1] 储金龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽建筑大学建筑与规划学院,安徽合肥230022 [2]池州学院皖江城市发展研究中心,安徽池州247000

出　　处：《华东经济管理》2015年第12期51-56,100,共7页East China Economic Management

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSK11-12D209)

摘　　要：城市效率是衡量城市发展水平的重要指标。文章以皖江城市带地级市为研究样本,建立DEA模型的评价指标体系,运用DEA交叉模型对皖江城市带各城市进行效率分析,采用ESDA探索性空间数据分析研究了皖江城市带城市效率的演化过程及空间差异。得出以下结论:近年皖江城市带各城市GDP和固定资产投资都呈现大规模递增的态势,但城市效率普遍偏低,稳定性不强,并呈波动型发展的态势;传统工矿型城市的城市效率要低于综合型城市;城市效率与城市经济发展水平呈一定的正相关性;城市效率与城市规模具有一定的相关性,但在皖江城市带显著性不强。Urban efficiency is an important index to evaluate city development level. The paper, taking cities at prefecture- level in Wanjiang City Belt as the research sample, establishes an evaluation index system of DEA model, and employs the cross model of DEA to analyze the efficiency of cities in Wanjiang City Belt, and adopts ESDA exploratory, spatial data to ana- lyze their evolution process and spatial differences. The major conclusions are as follows： GDP and fixed assets investment of cities in Wanjiang City Belt present the large-scale increasing trend in recent years, but the urban efficiency is generally low and unstable with fluctuating development. The urban efficiency of traditional industrial anti mining cities is lower than that of comprehensive cities. The urban efficiency and city development level show a certain positive correlation. The urban efficiency and the urban size are correlative to some degree, which is not significant in Wanjiang City Belt.

关 键 词：城市效率 DEA-ESDA 皖江城市带 差异评价 

分 类 号：F292[经济管理—国民经济]