Innography、WIPS和Patentics专利引文分析比较研究  

Comparative Research on Patent Citation Analysis Among Innography,WIPS and Patentics

作　　者：陈海英[1] 文禹衡 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学知识产权学院,湘潭411105

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2015年第18期117-126,共10页Library and Information Service

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国云计算知识产权问题与对策研究"(项目编号:11AZD113)研究成果之一

摘　　要：[目的 /意义]比较Innography、WIPS和Patentics 3个专利检索系统的引文分析功能,旨在帮助用户识别满足自己需要的专利引文分析工具,同时提出进一步完善专利检索系统引文分析功能的建议。[方法 /过程]通过比较3个专利检索系统引文收录范围、引文检索方式、前引后引查找功能、引文类型区分功能、非专利文献查找功能、可视化呈现功能和引文检索准确度,发现3个专利检索系统都具备基础的引文分析功能,但各有不足,难以满足现实需求。[结果 /结论]Innography应加强数据清洗,WIPS需扩大引文收录范围,Patentics则要增强系统稳定性,三者在检索数据准确性方面都有待提高。[Purpose / significance]Appropriate tools are of great significance for patent citation analysis. This paper comparatively analyzes the citation analysis functions of three patent retrieval systems——Innography,WIPS and Patentics,to help users quickly select the appropriate citation analysis tool and provide a sound proposal for the development of citation functions of patent retrieval system. [Method / process]This paper compares the three systems from aspects of the collection scope of patent citations,citation search method,the function to search forward citation and backward citation,the function to distinguish different types of citations,the function to search non-patent literature,visualization capability and accuracy of citation retrieval. It finds that the citation analysis functions of each of them have advantages and disadvantages. [Result / conclusion]All of the three patent retrieval systems possess basic patent citation retrieval functions,but Innography should improve in cleaning data,WIPS should expand the collection scope of patent citation,and Patentics should enhance its stability,and all of them should improve the accuracy of retrieving data.

关 键 词：专利检索系统 专利引文 专利引文分析 Innography WIPS Patentics 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] G306