检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南民族大学经济学院,昆明650504 [2]云南大学经济学院,昆明650091
出 处:《西部论坛》2015年第6期44-54,共11页West Forum
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(10CJL044)
摘 要:基于城镇居民家庭特征变量和组织变量,采用CGSS2013数据,通过Logistic模型分析我国城镇居民住房获取概率和获取不同类型住房概率的差异及其影响因素,研究表明:我国针对福利分房制度的市场化改革提高了居民的住房水平,但是在市场化转型过程中,再分配权力资源对住房资源仍然保持着占有上的优势。非市场因素对居民住房的获取产生了较为显著的影响,拥有制度优势的城镇户口居民、机关事业单位工作人员和商业精英在优质住房获取的机会上具有较为明显的优势。应继续深化以市场配置资源的住房制度改革,也要积极探索和推进户籍制度改革,消除"等级"观念的消极影响。Based on characteristic variables and organizational variables of urban resident families,by using China's General Social Survey data( CGSS 2013),by Logistic model,this paper analyzes the difference in the probability of the house taking of urban residents of China and taking different type houses and its influencing factors. The research demonstrates that the urban residents' housing level is improved by welfare housing share,but in the market transition process,re-allocation right of the houses still takes advantages in housing resources. Non-market factors have obvious influence on housing taking,the residents who have urban register,the employees who work in governments and governmental units and who succeed in business have significant advantages in the house taking. China should deepen housing system reform by taking market to allocate resources,actively explore and push forward register system reform,and remove the passive influence by ranking ideas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3