检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐嘏毅 何紫薇[1] 苏贺靖[2] 张杰[2] 吕梦翔[2] 王兆龙[3] 台红祥
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学临床医学院医疗系,天津300270 [2]天津医科大学临床医学院实验中心,天津300270 [3]天津医科大学实验室与设备管理处,天津300070
出 处:《解剖学报》2015年第6期848-851,共4页Acta Anatomica Sinica
摘 要:目的探讨运用不同填充剂与透明方式制作小鼠回肠血管透明标本的方法,评价其优缺点。方法运用简易毛细管黏滞计测定填充剂的黏滞系数。8只小鼠被分为4组。采用改良灌流方法清洗血管,分别注入不同的填充剂,用不同的透明方法处理,比较肠组织和透明剂的折光指数。结果硝化纤维素填充剂的黏滞系数、填充效果均优于其他组;20℃下,肠组织与透明剂折光指数差值分别为甘油法:2.2×10-3n D,透明-固定液法:65.8×10-3n D。结论以硝化纤维素填充剂填充血管,使用透明-固定液法处理后,得到的标本效果较好。Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of the method for preparing mouse ileum transparent vascular specimens with different fillers and transparent manner. Methods The viscosity coefficients(VCs) of the filler through a simple capillary tube were measured. Eight mice were divided into 4 groups. The blood vessel was washed by the modified perfusion method, injected with different fillers, and treated with different transparency. The refractive indexes(RIs) of ileum tissues and transparent agent were compared. Results Both of the VCs and filling effect of material nitrocellulose were better than other groups. At 20℃ , the difference value of RIs between ileum tissues and transparent solutions were 2.2×10^-3nD (Glycerin) and 65.8×10^-3 nD (Transparent-fixative) , respectively. Conclusion The specimen which was filled with nitrocellulose and treated with transparent-fixative method has the better effect.
分 类 号:R322.34[医药卫生—人体解剖和组织胚胎学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.152.227