机构地区:[1]新汶矿业集团中心医院骨外科,山东莱芜271219 [2]莱州人民医院检验科,山东莱州261400 [3]山东大学第二医院循证医学中心,山东济南250033 [4]山东大学第二医院内分泌科,山东济南250033 [5]山东大学第二医院检验科,山东济南250033
出 处:《山东大学学报(医学版)》2015年第11期55-58,63,共5页Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
基 金:山东省自然科学基金(ZR2014HM023);济南市高校自主创新计划(201303048)
摘 要:目的探讨骨折对2型糖尿病患者凝血活性的影响及其与血栓性疾病发生的关系。方法测定2型糖尿病合并下肢骨折患者(糖尿病骨折组,n=90)、2型糖尿病患者(糖尿病组,n=90)及性别、年龄、体质量指数(BMI)均有可比性的健康人群(正常对照组,n=90)的血浆纤维蛋白原(Fib)、D-二聚体(D-dimer)、血管性血友病因子(v WF)、血小板膜颗粒糖蛋白140(GMP-140)、凝血酶原片段1+2(F1+2)、凝血酶激活的纤溶抑制物(TAFI)及组织因子途径抑制物(TFPI)等含量或活性水平,并进行组间比较。结果糖尿病骨折组Fib、D-dimer、v WF、GM P-140、F1+2和TAFI的测定值分别为(5.3±1.4)g/L、(1 350.1±88.3)ng/m L、(161.9±6.6)IU/d L、(21.8±2.5)μg/L、(1.6±0.5)nmol/L、(30.5±3.8)μg/m L;糖尿病组的相应测定值分别为(4.1±1.2)g/L、(880.5±35.6)ng/m L、(123.6±5.5)IU/d L、(18.9±2.3)μg/L、(1.3±0.3)nmol/L、(28.3±2.9)μg/m L,正常对照组的相应测定值分别为(2.5±0.6)g/L、(145.7±22.5)ng/m L、(96.8±4.5)IU/d L、(13.8±2.1)μg/L、(0.8±0.2)nmol/L、(26.4±2.5)μg/m L,糖尿病骨折组和糖尿病组的测定值均较正常对照组显著增高(F=141.70、10 396.17、3 072.95、277.67、116.05、39.06,P<0.001),且糖尿病骨折组较糖尿病组显著增高(18.5±2.7);糖尿病骨折组和糖尿病组的血浆TFPI活性均低于正常对照组(16.2±1.3,17.3±2.1,18.5±2.7,U/m L),且糖尿病骨折组较糖尿病组更低,差异有统计学意义(F=26.68,P<0.001)。结论骨折可导致糖尿病患者的凝血活性增强,高凝状态加剧,进而易发生血栓栓塞性疾病。Objective To explore the effects of fracture on the activity of blood coagulation in patients with type 2 dia- betes mellitus and the relationship between fracture and thrombotic diseases. Methods A total of 90 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and lower limb fracture (diabetic and fracture group), 90 patients with type 2 diabetes (diabetic group) and 90 healthy controls with comparable of sex, age and body mass index (control group) were recruited. The contents or activity of plasma fibrinogen (Fib), D-dimer (D-dimer), yon willebrand factor (vWF), platelet mem- brane glycoprotein 140 (GMP-140), prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), thrombin activation of fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), were compared. Results In the diabetic and facture group, the values of Fib, D-dimer, vWF, GMP-140, F1 +2 and TAFI were (5.3 ±1.4) g/L, (1 350. 1 ±88.3) ng/mL, (161.9±6.6) IU/dL, (21.8 ±2.5) μg/L, (1.6 ±0.5) nmol/L and (30.5 ±3.8) μg/mL, respectively. In the diabetic group, the values were (4.1 ± 1.2) g/L, (880.5 ± 35.6) ng/mL, ( 123.6 ± 5.5 ) IU/dL, ( 18.9 ± 2.3 ) μg,/L, ( 1.3 ±0.3 ) nmol/L, ( 28.3 ± 2.9) μg/mL, respectively. In the control group, the values were (2.5± 0.6 ) g/L, (145.7±22.5)ng/mL, (96.8±4.5)IU/dL, (13.8±2.1) μg/L, (0.8±0.2)nmol/L, (26.4±2.5) μg/mL, respectively. The values of the former two groups were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the values of the diabetic and fracture group were higher compared to those of the diabetic group ( F = 141.70, 10 396.17, 3 072.95, 277.67, 116.05, 277.67, P 〈0. 001 ). The plasma TFPI activity of the former two groups was lower than that of the control group ( 16.2 ± 1.3, 17.3 ±2.1, 18.5 ±2.7, U/mL). And it was the lowest in the dia- betic and fracture group ( F = 26. 68, P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion Fractures can lead to blood clotting activity and high
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...