检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈士敏[1] 李飒飒[1] 姜亚飞[1] 郭焕银[1] 郭航远[1]
机构地区:[1]绍兴市人民医院(浙江大学绍兴医院)
出 处:《医院管理论坛》2015年第11期28-29,17,共3页Hospital Management Forum
摘 要:目的本文着重研究"小病进社区、大病进医院、康复回社区"模式下的转诊制度实施情况,并就存在的问题提出建议。方法现场调查绍兴市人民医院实施双向转诊以来的就诊患者,收集已有的相关资料,主要通过描述性分析方法定量分析双向转诊情况。结果双向转诊率低,只有0.18%;但建立医联体的医院与社区之间的双向转诊人数占了总数的92%;双向转诊制度的知晓率只有6%。结论分级诊疗刚刚起步,双向转诊任重道远,工作开展需要着力点。Objective This paper focuses on the implementation situation of the referral system under the mode of “go into the community for minor illness, go to the hospital for serious illness and return to the community for rehabilitation”, and puts forward suggestions for the existing problems. Methods The patients who received medical services in Shaoxing People's Hospital since the implementation of two-way referral were surveyed, and the existing relevant materials were collected to analyze the situation of two-way referral with descriptive analysis. Results The two-way referral rate was low, only 0.18%, but the number of people who were referred between hospitals and communities in the health alliance accounted for 92% of the total. The awareness rate of two-way referral is only 6%. Conclusion Grading diagnosis and treatment were iust launched. The two-wav referral is a long and arduous task, and the focus of the work should be identified.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173