检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹喜梅[1] 贾颖[1] 杨艳红[1] 骆圆圆[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属人民医院烧伤整形科,江苏镇江212002
出 处:《海南医学》2015年第22期3428-3430,共3页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨预见性护理在VSD引流配合转移性皮瓣修复足部外伤性皮肤缺损中的效果。方法回顾性分析36例患者的临床资料,依据患者的性别、年龄、损伤部位与面积、手术方式及护理措施进行匹配分组,常规护理组及预见性护理组各18例,比较两组患者在皮瓣成活率、平均住院时间、护理满意度方面的差别。结果预见性护理组18例患者皮瓣移植均一次性成功(皮瓣成活率为100%),常规护理组18例患者中2例发生部分皮瓣坏死(皮瓣成活率为88.9%),二者的皮瓣存活率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);预见性护理组患者平均住院时间[(27.3±5.4)d]低于常规护理组[(31.5±8.2)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);预见性护理组患者满意度评分[(4.6±0.6)分]高于常规护理组[(3.8±1.2)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论预见性护理能缩短VSD引流配合转移性皮瓣修复足部外伤性皮肤缺损患者的住院时间,提高其护理满意度,值得临床推广。Objective To discuss the effects of predictive nursing in transfer flap transplantation combined with vacuum sealing drainage(VSD) for treatment of traumatic foot skin defect. Methods Thirty-six patients were paired into two groups according to gender, age, injury location and area, surgical methods and nursing measures: group1(18 cases, received predictive nursing) and group 2(18 cases, received routine nursing). The flap survival rates, average length of hospital stay, nursing satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups. Results The flap survival rate was 100% in the group 1 and 88.9% in the group 2, showing no statistically significant difference(P〉0.05).Compared with the group 2, the average length of hospital stay in group 1 was decreased [(27.3±5.4) d vs(31.5±8.2) d],and the nursing satisfaction degree score in group 1 was increased [(4.6±0.6) vs(3.8±1.2)], with statistically significant difference(P〈0.05). Conclusion For the patients of traumatic foot skin defect treated with transfer flap transplantation combined with VSD, predictive nursing can reduce the length of hospital stay and improve the nursing satisfaction degree, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248