检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤恭锋
出 处:《中国美容医学》2015年第22期46-48,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较超脉冲CO2激光与液氮冷冻治疗睑黄瘤的临床疗效。方法:将94例睑黄瘤患者随机分为超脉冲CO2激光组和液氮冷冻治疗组,其中激光组58例,冷冻组36例,3个月后判定疗效并观察比较治疗效果。结果:超脉冲CO2激光组痊愈率为74.14%,不良反应率为6.90%;液氮冷冻治疗组痊愈率为30.56%,不良反应率为44.44%。两组痊愈率与不良反应发生率比较,均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:超脉冲CO2激光治疗睑黄瘤的临床疗效明显优于液氮冷冻,值得临床推广和应用。Objective To compare the efficacy of xanthelasma with ultrapulse CO2 laser and liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Methods 94 cases with xanthelasma were randomly divided into ultrapulse CO2 laser group and liquid nitrogen cryotherapy group,58 cases in laser group and 36 cases in cryotherapy group.The clinical efficacy were oberserved and compared after 3 months. Results In ultrapulse CO2 laser group,the cure rate was 74.14%,and the adverse reaction rate was 6.90%,while in liquid nitrogen cryotherapy group,there was 30.56% and 44.44%.There were significant difference in the cure rate and the adverse reaction rate between two groups(P〈0.05,). Conclusion The utrapulse CO2 laser therapy to treat xanthelasma was better than liquid nitrogen cryotherapy.lt was worthy of promotion in the treatment of xanthelasma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175