法律选择协议效力的法律适用辩释  

Application of the Law on the Validity of Agreement on the Choice of Law

作　　者：沈涓[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院国际法研究所

出　　处：《法学研究》2015年第6期191-206,共16页Chinese Journal of Law

摘　　要：意思自治原则下,当事人选择法律的合意是否有效,直接关系到意思自治的实现,但现有研究较少涉及这一问题。目前国际私法学界存在当事人选法协议效力适用当事人所选之法和适用法院地法两种主张的分歧。适用当事人所选之法确定选法协议效力的主张和规定存在逻辑矛盾等诸多弱点,特别是存在合同之外领域无法采行的重大缺陷。选法协议的内容是法律选择规则,确定选法协议效力是法律选择规则的适用过程。意思自治原则体系既包括赋予当事人选择法律的权利,也包括限制当事人意思自治的条件。合同领域之外的法律关系适用当事人选择的法律确定选法协议效力存在更大不合理性。适用法院地法确定选法协议效力才是更合理、更可行的方法。Although the validity of agreement on the choice of law has a direct influence on the reali- zation of autonomy of will, currently very few studies have been carried out on this issue. At present, there are two different opinions on the validity of agreement on the choice of law in the field of private international law： the application of the law chosen by the parties and the application of the law of the court. This paper points out that there are many chosen by the parties for the confirmation of the weaknesses in the method of application of the law validity of agreement on the choice of law, such as logical contradiction and inapplicability in areas other than contract law; the content of an agreement on the choice of law should be the rules on the choice of law, and the confirmation of the validity of an agreement on the choice of law is the application of the rules on the choice of law ; the principle of au- tonomy of will not only gives the parties the right of the choice of law, but also sets a limit to such au- tonomy; the confirmation of the validity of an agreement on the choice of law through the application of the law chosen by the parties in areas other than contract law is even more unreasonable; in such areas, the application of the law of the court is a more reasonable and feasible approach.

关 键 词：法律选择协议 法律适用 意思自治原则 当事人选择的法律 法院地法 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]