沈彤《仪礼》学研究浅析  

Analysis of the Study of Notes and Commentaries of the Etiquette by Shen Tong

作　　者：邓声国[1] 

机构地区：[1]井冈山大学人文学院,江西吉安343009

出　　处：《江西科技师范大学学报》2015年第5期14-22,共9页Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"清代<仪礼>学史"(项目编号:12BZS008)阶段性研究成果之一

摘　　要：在康、乾时期"兼采汉宋"学风的礼学思潮下,吴江沈彤顺应和张扬这一治学风尚,研治《仪礼》并不宗主汉、唐、宋、元众多学者一家之说,而是善于运用考据手段,从郑《注》、贾《疏》、敖氏《集说》等各家训释分歧捕捉入手,剖析前贤各自立说的是非得失,进而形成可信的训释见解。《仪礼小疏》著述体例并不整齐划一,加之考据中偶有"过于推求,转致疏舛"之弊,并没有淹没沈氏在《仪礼》学研究方面的贡献,它开启了乾嘉时期汉学考据派学者注重小学考据的研究学风,揭开了乾嘉时期《仪礼》今古文校勘和注疏类校勘考证的先河,对之后的《仪礼》诠释与校勘实践产生了较大影响。the writing style and the textual research of Notes and Commentaries of the Etiquette were not sound, but they did not cover up Shen Tong’s contribution in the science research on the etiquette. It opened the study style of sinology textual research scholars in the dynasties of Emperors of Qianlong and Jiaqing, and earlier used the ancient prose collating and collating textual research method, which has a greater influence on the later explanation notes and collating practice.

关 键 词：沈彤 《仪礼小疏》 著述体例 诠释特色 诠释影响 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]