检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘明军[1]
出 处:《中国实用医刊》2015年第23期68-69,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的 比较夹板固定与外固定支架治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折的疗效. 方法 选取2013年1月至2014年1月桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者74例,随机分为两组,对照组36例,采用夹板固定,观察组38例,采用外固定支架治疗,对比两组临床效果. 结果 观察组优良率为89.5%,对照组为优良率63.8%,两组比较差异有统计学意义( P〈0.05);观察组并发症发生率为5.3%,对照组并发症发生率为19.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义( P〈0.05). 结论 对桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者采用外固定支架治疗效果显著优于夹板固定治疗,可减少并发症,具有推广价值.Objective To compare the efficacy splint fixtion and external fixation on unstable distal radius frac-ture.Methods From January 2013 to January 2014, 74 cases of Unstable distal radius fractures were selected and were divided into two groups , 36 patients in the control group using the splint , 38 cases in the observation group receiving exter-nal fixator , the clinical effects of two groups were compared .Results Excellent rate in observation group was 89.5%, that was 63.8%in control group, there was significant difference (P〈0.05); the complication rate in observation group was 5.3%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (19.4%), the difference was significant (P〈0.05).Conclusions Unstable distal radius fractures treated with external fixation treatment is significantly better than splint treatment , it can reduce complications , so is worthy of promotion .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249