CO_2激光手术与常规喉镜手术治疗声带息肉的临床效果分析  

Analysis of the curative effect of CO_2 laser and conventional laryngoscope operation in the treatm ent of polyp of vocal cord

作　　者：钟燕梅[1] 殷海[1] 冯钰[1] 吴家森[1] 刘柏松[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵港市人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,广西贵港537100

出　　处：《中国医学前沿杂志（电子版）》2015年第10期119-121,共3页Chinese Journal of the Frontiers of Medical Science(Electronic Version)

摘　　要：目的分析比较CO_2激光手术与常规喉镜手术治疗声带息肉的临床效果,探讨不同类型声带息肉适宜的治疗方法。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2013年5月本院收治的184例声带息肉患者的临床资料,按照治疗方法不同将其分为激光组(CO_2激光手术治疗,86例)和常规组(常规喉镜手术治疗,98例),对比分析两组患者治疗效果。结果两组患者治疗总有效率及嗓音学各指标比较均无显著差异(P>0.05),激光组患者术后声带恢复时间明显长于常规组,复杂型息肉的治疗效果明显优于常规组(P<0.05)。结论 CO_2激光手术与常规喉镜手术治疗声带息肉疗效相似,需综合考虑患者的实际情况选择恰当的手术方式。Objective To compare the effect of CO2 laser and conventional laryngoscope operation in the treatment of polyp of vocal cord.Method Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 184 patients with polyp of vocal cord who were treated in our hospital from March 2010 to May 2013,they were divided into laser group（treated with CO2 laser,86 cases） and conventional group（treated with conventional laryngoscope operation,98 cases）,treatment effect between the two groups were compared.Result The general cure rate and acoustic indexes between the two groups were not significantly different（P〉0.05）.After operation,the recovery time of vocal cords in laser group was longer than conventional group,and the effect of complex polyp of vocal cord in laser group was better than conventional group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The clinical effect of polyp of vocal cord treated with CO2 laser is the same as conventional laryngoscope operation,then we should combine the physical truth of patients to choose a more scientific method.

关 键 词：声带息肉 CO2激光 喉镜手术 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]