探究前列地尔联合中医补气活血法治疗糖尿病周围神经病变效果  

To Explore the Forefront to Er Qi and Combined Western Medicine for the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

作　　者：裴继艳[1] 田丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]唐山市人民医院,河北唐山063000

出　　处：《辽宁中医药大学学报》2015年第12期94-96,共3页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：河北省卫生厅计划项目(20150975)

摘　　要：目的:评价探究前列地尔联合中医补气活血法治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床效果。方法:将82例患者随机分组,研究组采用中医补气活血法联合前列地尔进行治疗,对照组仅进行前列地尔治疗;回顾性分析两组的临床疗效,并对并发症情况进行比较。结果:治疗后两组D二聚体、纤维蛋白原含量均较治疗前有明显降低,且研究组较对照组有明显降低,两组差异较明显,均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。研究组治疗总有效率为90.2%,高于对照组65.9%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组治疗总不良反应率为21.95%,对照组总不良反应率为34.14%,差异有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:前列地尔联合中医补气活血法治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床效果较佳,既可有效改善患者的临床表现,又可改善患者术后生活质量,整体过程安全可靠,因此值得临床推广应用。Objective：To evaluate the probe lead to er qi and combined western medicine for treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods：82 patients were assigned randomly,the research group accepted western medicine combined qi and method that lead to treatment,the control group only for front row,treatment;the clinical curative effect of two groups were analyzed retrospectively,and compared their complications. Results：Two groups after treatment dimer and fibrinogen content were lower significantly than before,and the research group lower significantly than control group,differences between the two groups were obvious,were statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Treatment group total effective rate was 90.2%,higher than the control group（65.9%）,the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Treatment group total adverse reaction rate was 21.95%,control group total adverse reaction rate was 34.14%,the difference was statistically difference（P〈0.05）. Conclusion：Front row,qi and combined western medicine in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy effect is better,could improve the patient＇s clinical manifestations effectively,and improve patient＇s life quality,both safe and reliable,therefore,be worth to propel in clinical.

关 键 词：中医治疗 糖尿病周围神经病变 临床效果 

分 类 号：R587.1[医药卫生—内分泌]