证据合法性视域下侦查取证行为的规制  

On the Restriction of Investigation Beavior from the Perspective of Evidence Legality

作　　者：刘权[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南警察学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2015年第5期87-93,共7页Journal of Henan Police College

摘　　要：司法实践中刑事案件被退回补充侦查或作不起诉处理,许多都是缘于取证程序中某些取证行为合法性欠缺而受到质疑,进而导致证据无法使用,因此展开取证程序合法性问题的研究对于规范取证行为、保障取证程序合法具有重要的现实意义。以分析证据合法性的内涵为切入点,强调在对证据排除时应明确区分合法证据、非法证据与瑕疵证据,通过对侦查取证行为合法性调查的启动、责任承担、证明方法、证明标准的研究解决个案中证据合法性问题,通过构建取证规则、建立检察指导侦查和辩诉交易制度、完善辩护制度等约束性机制,从源头规范侦查取证行为,保障证据合法有效,避免非法证据、减少瑕疵证据。In judicial practice, some criminal cases are returned for supplementary investigation or for not pros- ecuting. This phenomenon is due to the invalid evidence resulting from the illegality of investigation behavior. Therefore, launching a study of the legality of investigation procedure is of great significance to standardize the be- havior of evidence collection and safeguard the legality of evidence collecting procedure. This paper starts from the analysis of the connotation of evidence legality and argues the following viewpoints ： it needs to distinguish the legal evidence from illegal evidence and defective evidence in the stage of exclusion of illegal evidence ; the study of le- gality of evidence in cases should take the legality of investigation behavior, accountability, and methods of proof and standard of proof into consideration ; in order to safeguard legal evidence, avoid illegal evidence and reduce de- fective evidence, it is needed to establish evidence collecting regulations, build the system of investigation guided by procuratorate and the system of plea bargaining, and perfect the system of advocacy.

关 键 词：侦查取证 行为合法 证明 制度约束 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]