检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伟华[1] 郑逸华[1] 徐利萍[1] 林雪梅[1] 林建青[1] 徐文芳[1] 徐林燕[1] 李振华[1]
出 处:《浙江医学》2015年第22期1839-1842,共4页Zhejiang Medical Journal
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2011KYA166)
摘 要:目的观察万古霉素封管治疗机械通气患者葡萄球菌导致的中心静脉导管相关血流感染(catheter-related bloodstream infection,CRBSI)的临床疗效。方法选择机械通气患者葡萄球菌导致的CRBSI患者,随机分为治疗组(31例)和对照组(32例)。治疗组采用万古霉素封管联合静脉滴注万古霉素治疗;对照组采用静脉滴注万古霉素治疗。观察两组患者的痊愈率、有效率、拔管率及安全性。结果葡萄球菌导致的CRBSI的临床疗效:治疗组痊愈率、有效率、拔管率分别为65.6%、75.0%、18.8%,对照组分别为38.7%、48.4%、38.7%,两组差别有统计学意义(均P<0.05);凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)导致的CRBSI的临床疗效:治疗组痊愈率、有效率、拔管率分别是68.2%、77.3%、18.2%,对照组分别是40.0%、50.0%、35.0%,两组比较差别均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);金黄色葡萄球菌导致的CRBSI的临床疗效:治疗组痊愈率、有效率、拔管率分别是60.0%、70.0%、30.0%,对照组分别36.4%、45.5%、45.5%,两组比较差别均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论万古霉素和肝素混合液封管,同时全身静脉使用万古霉素治疗机械通气患者葡萄球菌感染CRBSI,明显提高痊愈率、有效率,降低拔管率,并有良好的安全性。Objective To evaluate vancomycin-sealed tube method for treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) caused by Staphylococcus in mechanical ventilation patients with central venous catheter. Methods Sixty-three mechanical ventilation patients with CRBSI caused by Staphylococcus admitted in Jiangshan People's Hospital were divided into study group (n=31) and control group (n=32) randomly: patients in study group received intravenous infusion of vancomycin with vancomycin-sealed tube, and patients in control group received intravenous infusion of vancomycin only. The cure rate, effective rate, extubation rate and safety were compared between two groupsy. Results The cure rate, effective rate for CRBSI caused by Staphylococcus in study group were significantly higher than those in control group (65.6% vs 38.7% and 75.0% vs 48.4%, both P〈O.05), and the extubation rate in study was lower than that in control group (18.8% vs 38.7%, P〈0.05). The cure rate, effective rate for CRBSI caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in study group were significantly higher than those in control group (68.2% vs 40.0%, 77.3% vs 50.0, both P〈0.05), and the extubation rate in study was lower than that in control group (18.2% vs 35.0%, P〈0.05). The cure rate, effective rate for CRBSI caused by Staphylococcus aureus in study group were also significantly higher than those in control group (60.0% vs 36.4% and 70.0% vs 45.5%, both P〈0.05), and the extubation rate in study was lower than that in control group(30.0% vs 45.5%3, P〈0.05). Conclusion The vacomicin-sealed tube method increases the cure rate, effective rate and reduces the extubation rate with high safety in treatment of staphylococcus CRBSI for mechanical ventilation patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46