侵权补充责任的独立地位及其体系化  

The Independence of Complementary Liability in Tort Law and Its Systematization

作　　者：张平华[1,2] 王圣礼[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学法学院,山东烟台264005 [2]烟台大学中欧侵权法研究院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第6期24-35,共12页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"侵权连带责任法定原则及其运行机制研究"(11CFX016);山东省社科基金项目"环境侵权地方政府责任研究"(14CFXJ21)

摘　　要：除俄罗斯法外,比较法上侵权补充责任并未获得独立地位。只有在体系化中侵权补充责任才能获得独立地位,而其关键是:在理清与连带责任、不真正连带责任关系的基础上形成完整的多数人侵权责任体系。在参照一般补充责任设立法律效力的前提下,形成民法上完备的补充责任体系。侵权补充责任具备拾遗补漏的赔偿功能,其规范兼容应然与实然,具有严格法属性。未来立法应当承认补充责任人之先诉抗辩权和追偿权,并限缩其责任范围。Except in Russia,complementary liability in tort law is not deemed to be independent in comparative laws. Only systematization can foster the independence of complementary liability in tort law,and the key to this is to form a complete tort law liability system after clarifying its relationship with joint several liability,and unreal joint several liability. Under the premise of referring to the legal effect of ordinary complementary liability,the complementary liability system in Civil Law shall come into being. The complementary liability in tort law shall possess the function of compensating the omitting part,whose specifications shall balance between what ought to be and what is,possessing the quality of ius strictum. The future legislation shall have to admit that the party bearing the complementary liability shall enjoy the benefit of discussion and the right of recourse within a limited scope.

关 键 词：侵权补充责任 独立地位 体系化 关键 

分 类 号：D923.3[政治法律—民商法学]