《中国图书馆分类法》(第五版)类目设置谬误及其文化内涵表述的局限——以文学大类为例  

The Errors of Categories Setting in Chinese Library Classification(5th Edition)and Its Cultural Limitation of Expression——Taking Literary Categories as the Example

作　　者：董涛[1] 李万社[2] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学图书馆 [2]陕西师范大学图书馆

出　　处：《图书馆工作与研究》2015年第12期75-77,84,共4页Library Work and Study

基　　金：陕西省社科基金项目"陕西非物质文化遗产数字化保护与知识库构建"(项目编号:12M003);陕西省图书馆学会项目"基于主题图技术的非物质文化遗产知识库研究"(项目编号:12002)研究成果之一

摘　　要：关于《中国图书馆分类法》文学类类目设置问题的探讨已有很多成果,但是在第五版修订之后依然存在类目名称前后相悖,上下位类不合理等突出问题。文章试罗列《中图法》(第五版)I大类中有明显谬误类目,并以此为例探讨分类法自身体系缺陷,以期对《中国图书馆分类法》的日臻完善提供参考。There has been a lot of discussions about the Chinese Library Classification literature category setting, but after the revised about the fifth edition, there still exist outstanding problems such as category name inconsistency and some unreasonable categories. This article tries to list the ＂I＂ categories in Chinese Library Classification that have obvious errors in the category, and discusses the defects of classification, in order to provide ref- erence to make Chinese Library Classification more perfect.

关 键 词：中国图书馆分类法(第五版) 文学类 类目设置 

分 类 号：G254.1[文化科学—图书馆学]