检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:易承志[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学政治学与公共管理学院,上海201620
出 处:《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年第6期16-26,共11页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目"大都市发展中的政府治理机制创新与绩效评估体系研究"(10CZZ025);霍英东教育基金会第十三届高等院校青年教师基金基础性研究课题"基于大都市区和谐发展的政府协同治理模式创新研究--以长三角为例"(131091)
摘 要:现有研究对政治信任、内在效能感与城乡基层民主选举投票行为之间的关系存在争议。基于CGSS2010的大样本调查数据,本文定量研究了中国公民的政治信任和内在效能感对其参与城乡基层民主选举投票的影响。研究发现,公民对基层地方政府的信任程度显著影响到其参加城乡基层民主选举投票的行为,而内在效能感对公民参加基层民主选举的投票行为没有显著影响。考虑到当前公民对基层地方政府的信任程度不高,采取有效措施进一步提升公民对基层地方政府的信任,对于促进城乡基层民主持续发展具有重要意义。There are controversies in existing literature on the relationship between political trust,internal political efficacy and citizens' voting behavior in grassroots democratic elections in China.Based on a large sample survey data of Chinese General Social Survey 2010(CGSS 2010),this paper quantitatively studies the impact that citizens' political trust and internal efficacy exert on their voting behavior in grassroots democratic elections across urban and rural China.Results show that,citizens' trust in the basic-level governments has a significant influence on their voting behavior in grassroots democratic elections, while their internal political efficacy is of no importance.Taking into account that current citizens' trust in grassroots governments is still not high,to take effective measures to further enhance citizens' trust in the grassroots governments is of great significance for promoting the sustainable development of grassroots democracy in urban and rural China.
分 类 号:D638[政治法律—政治学] D621.4[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91