检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:菲利普.苏克 迈克尔.韦伯 陈忠暖[2] 王帅[2]
机构地区:[1]德国汉堡大学人文地理学系 [2]华南师范大学地理科学学院
出 处:《城市观察》2015年第6期29-39,共11页Urban Insight
摘 要:创意空间被视为中国向知识经济转型中突出的成果。本文旨在建构分析广州市创意空间发展的理论框架,分析地方政府在其中的复杂角色,并以红专厂为案例进行深入分析。红专厂经历了一条独特的发展路径:最初它只是看作一个创意空间,但很快发展成中国南部地区一个著名的创意园区,现在它却又面临着被拆除的威胁。本文分析采用了郑洁建构的"企业化政府"概念。结果表明:(1)掌握关键资源的个人主导政府决策现象在地方政府仍然高度盛行。尽管创意空间的管治框架在逐步演变,这在市一级政府中仍然发生。(2)现阶段,创意空间的制度化发展框架不仅没有完成,而且显得破碎化。(3)案例研究也表明企业化的地方政府及其政策制定都高度依赖上级政府。Creative spaces can be regarded as significant visible outcomes of China's transition towards a knowledge-based economy. The aim of this paper is to analyze the process of building a framework to develop creative spaces in the southern mega-city Guangzhou and to provide further insights into the complex aspects of the local state. To this end, it presents an indepth study of Guangzhou's Redtory Art + Design Factory. Redtory witnessed a unique development path: while it was initially merely tolerated as a creative space, it soon developed into one of the most prominent creative zones in southern China; presently, however, it is threatened with demolition. This analysis employs the concept of the "entrepreneurial state" developed by Jane Zheng. The results of the analysis suggest that a high degree of personalized coordination of key resources still prevails at the local level. This is nonetheless happening in spite of the gradual evolution of a regulatory framework governing creative spaces at the municipal level. This indi" cates that the institutionalization of creative spaces is in no way complete, but rather fragmented. Ultimately, this case-study indicates that the entrepreneurial local state and its policy-making are highly dependent on higher levels of the party-state.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28