持续低流量生理盐水冲洗对持续负压封闭引流技术堵管情况的影响  

Effect of continuous low flow physiological saline flushing for continuous vacuum sealing drainage patients pipeline plugging conditions

作　　者：蒋玉蓉[1] 廖新阳[1] 许士海[1] 苏发梅 黄智敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省深圳市人民医院骨关节二区,深圳市518020

出　　处：《护理实践与研究》2015年第12期46-47,共2页Nursing Practice and Research

摘　　要：目的：探讨持续低流量生理盐水冲洗对留置负压封闭引流技术（VSD）管道患者堵管情况的影响。方法：选择2014年1~5月在我科住院并使用VSD治疗软组织损伤的患者50例,随机分为对照组20例和观察组30例,观察组使用生理盐水以1 ml/min的速度持续低流量冲洗。对照组采用常规VSD引流。对两组患者的堵管情况、导管留置时间、护理导管与置管耗费时间、VSD耗材费用进行观察及比较。结果：观察组发生堵管情况、留置管道时间、护理管道时间、置管耗费时间、VSD耗材费用均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P均〈0.05）。结论：持续低流量冲洗VSD管道,能有效的避免管道堵塞。Objective： To investigate continuous low flow saline impact on retention vacuum sealing drainage（ VSD） patients pipeline plugging conditions.Methods： From January to May 2014 in our hospital and using VSD treatment of soft tissue injuries of 50 patients were randomly divided into a control group of 20 cases and 30 cases of the observation group,the observation group using saline to 1 ml / min rate of sustained low- flow water. VSD control group with conventional drainage. For plugging in the two groups of patients,catheter time,catheters and catheter care takes time,VSD supplies costs were observed and compared. Results： The occurrence of plugging,the indwelling pipeline time,nursing pipeline time,catheterization time consuming,VSD supplies costs were less than the control group,the difference was statistically significant（ P 〈 0. 05）. Conclusion： The continuous low flow flush VSD pipeline,which can effectively prevent pipeline blockage.

关 键 词：持续低流量冲洗 负压封闭引流 管道堵塞 影响 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]