瑕疵担保、加害给付与请求权竞合 债法总则给付障碍中的固有利益损害赔偿  

Liability for Warranty,Injuring Performance,and Concurrence of Civil Claim The Compensation for Damages of Inherent Interest in General Part of Law of Obligations

作　　者：朱晓喆[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2015年第5期1125-1149,共25页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金：上海市教育发展基金2012年曙光学者项目(12SG42);上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2013BFX010);上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(13ZS117);上海市法学会2014年十大理论法学研究课题项目的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：债之关系中的固有利益是与履行利益、信赖利益并列的债权人利益,可能因债务人的加害给付或违反保护义务而受到侵害。但加害给付与保护义务违反是各自独立的两种给付障碍形态。就加害给付的损害赔偿,德国民法以瑕疵担保责任予以救济,而我国台湾地区"民法"则采债务给付障碍的一般规则救济。我国民法上不存在独立的瑕疵担保责任,故而未来制定民法典仅须采用债法总则的加害给付一般规则即可解决各种债务中因给付有瑕疵而造成债权人固有利益损害的问题。加害给付如与侵权行为发生请求权竞合,如果所适用的责任规范法律效果有差异,应由当事人自由选择诉由,但同时应根据法律目的确定是否竞合之责任规范相互发生影响作用。The inherent interest in the obligations is the creditor＇s interest that ties with performance interest and reliance interest. It may be aggrieved due to injuring performance or violation of duty of care of debtor. However, the injuring performance and violation of duty of care are two forms of defaults in performance. In German Civil Law, damages caused by the injuring performance of debtor should be re- lieved through the system of warranty against defects. While in Taiwan ＂Civil Law＂, they should be re- lieved through general rule of defaults in performance. There is no independent warranty liability in the civil law of China. Therefore, the damages caused by the injuring performance of debtor can only be re- lieved through general rule of defaults in performance in China. If the claim of injuring performance coex- ists with the claim of tort, the creditor norms interact with the other according has the freedom of choice, provide that it can be confirmed the to the legal purpose.

关 键 词：瑕疵担保责任 不完全给付 加害给付 请求权竞合 规范目的 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]