检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安石油大学,陕西西安710065
出 处:《广州化工》2015年第23期67-69,共3页GuangZhou Chemical Industry
摘 要:比较了SRK方程,PR方程,童景山方程和苏志军方程4个通用立方型状态方程用于R134a饱和气、液的体积计算准确度。计算表明,在-50~90℃的范围内,童景山方程的计算偏差最小,饱和气与饱和液体积的计算值与文献值的平均偏差为1.63%和4.12%;PR方程的计算平均偏差为1.90%和4.76%;SRK方程平均偏差最大,为3.35%和18.64%;苏志军方程的计算偏差与PR方程基本相同,为2.00%和5.21%。结果表明,对于R134a来说,童景山方程的计算结果更加精确,更适合用于R134a热力性质的工程计算。The accuracy of saturated steam and liquid volume calculations for R134 a were compared,which was used by four general cubic equations of state: the SRK equation,the PR equation,the Tong Jingshan equation and the Su Zhijun equation. Calculations showed that in the range of- 50 ~ 90 ℃,the Tong Jingshan equation had the least calculation error,average deviation of saturated gas volume and liquid volume calculation values and literature values were1. 63% and 4. 12%,average deviation of the PR equation's calculation values and literature values were 1. 90% and4. 76%,average deviation of the SRK equation had the largest error,it's calculation values and literature values were3. 35% and 18. 64%,average deviation of the Su Zhijun equation was basically the same as the PR equation,it's calculation values and literature values were 2. 00% and 5. 21%. The results showed that for R134 a,the calculation of Tong Jingshan equation was more accurate, and it was more suitable for engineering calculations for R134a's Thermodynamic properties.
分 类 号:TK011[动力工程及工程热物理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15