法律议论的社会科学研究新范式  

New Method of Social Scientific Study in Legal Discussion

作　　者：季卫东[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2015年第6期25-41,共17页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目(项目批准号:10AFX003);清华大学产业发展与环境治理研究中心"法制与问责"项目的资助

摘　　要：本文以"法律不确定性问题"为出发点,沿着通过教义学或科学技术来摒弃不确定性以及反过来在不确定性的前提条件下考虑制度设计这样两条基本线索,梳理了法解释学与法社会学之间的争论以及不同的应对策略,从中归纳出作为科学的法学观、作为技艺的法学观以及法律的本质就是话语实践的核心命题。作者认为今后中国的问题导向跨学科研究应该聚焦法律议论,特别是法的社会科学研究要把重点从结构、功能转移到价值涵义,以便真正深入到规范的领域进行实证分析,与此同时切实加强与法解释学以及法律实务部门之间的对话。因此,作者提倡"议论的法社会学"研究范式,试图以此深化法律方法论的探讨,促进思想与制度的创新。This article starts from the issue of legal uncertainty, along with two basic clues including through dogmatics or scientific technique to abandon the uncertainty and considering system design under the uncertain precondition, sort out the discussion between legal hermeneutic and legal sociology and their different strategies, and conclude that the nature of legal concept as science, legal concept as technique and the law is the core of speech practice. The author supposes that future Chinese issue guiding of interdisciplinary research should focus on the legal discussion, especially the legal social scientific study of law should transfer the emphasis from structure and function to the implication of value for real empirical analysis in normative fields, at the same time, strengthen the communication with legal hermeneutic and legal practical departments. Therefore, the author encourages the study method of legal sociology in discussion, tries to enhance the discussion of legal methodology,and promote the innovation of thought and institution.

关 键 词：法律社会科学范式 不确定性问题 权利抗辩清单 网络互动关系 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]