检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏赟
机构地区:[1]福建省交通建设质量安全监督局,福州350001
出 处:《路基工程》2015年第6期128-132,共5页Subgrade Engineering
摘 要:运用FLAC3D数值分析软件,对无支护条件下某水电站左岸#1尾调室在两种施工方案下穹顶的围岩稳定性进行分析,并对#1尾调室穹顶围岩的应力分布特征、变形特征、塑性区分布特征等计算结果进行比较和分析,从而说明了两种开挖方案下围岩可能会出现的破坏特征。计算结果表明:与开挖方案1相比,开挖方案2不存在第3步开挖后的顶拱的应力集中和边墙的应力松弛问题,同时不会加大穹顶变形稳定问题,推荐采用第2种方案。With the numerical analysis software of FLAC3 D,the stability of rock surrounding the dome of the tailrace surge chamber#1 at the left bank of a hydropower station without any support was analyzed. The characteristics with regard to the stress distribution, deformation, plastic zone distribution of the rock surrounding the dome were calculated with the results compared and analyzed,elaborating the characteristics of rock failure likely developed. The calculation result shows that,compared with the scheme 1,the scheme 2 is free of stress concentration at the vault and stress relief at the side wall after the step 3 excavation;simultaneously,the dome deformation would not be increased. Therefore, the excavation scheme 2 is recommended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28