检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚平[1]
出 处:《现代法学》2015年第6期129-139,共11页Modern Law Science
基 金:2013年度国家社科基金项目"自由刑变更执行研究"(13BFX076)
摘 要:我国减刑、假释以教育、矫正犯罪人为目的,为此目的而构建的减刑、假释制度不仅实践操作与目的错位,而且还导致司法腐败、倾斜适用、释放后再犯罪等现实问题。西方国家最初设立减刑、假释制度,并不是为了教育、矫正犯罪人,后来教育刑论者试图以教育、矫正作为减刑、假释目的,最终却走向失败。晚近以来,重返社会思想因关注未来,帮助犯罪人重新适应社会生活而逐渐受到重视,不少国家以重返社会思想为指导,改革调整其减刑、假释制度,扩大渐进释放范围。我国减刑、假释的目的当转向重返社会,并构建以自动给予的减刑为基础的假释制度。Reduction of penalty and parole in China aim at education and correction. In the systems built for this goal,the practice can't meet this end,and some other practical problems exist,such as judicial corruption,application partiality,high rate of recidivism. The original systems of good-time credit and parole in Western countries were not aimed at education and correction,and later the systems were reformed to try to achieve education and correction,but turned out unsuccessful. Recently the reintegration or reentry idea became appreciated and accepted as directing policy for the reconstruction of the systems of reduction of penalty and parole in some countries because it focus on future and help prisoners readapt social life. In order to promote reintegration,the systems of reduction of penalty and parole of China should be reconstructed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49