检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马冉[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学法学院,郑州450001
出 处:《现代法学》2015年第6期154-162,共9页Modern Law Science
基 金:2012年度国家社科基金项目"贸易自由化背景下我国文化产业政策法规的发展与改革研究"(12BFX142);2011年度教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目"WTO体制下中国文化政策法规的困境与出路"(11YJC820079)
摘 要:人类永续发展的理性追求与知识产权贸易利益的冲突使得文化多样性与知识产权的关系渐成热点。TRIPS协定对于知识产权私人财产权的定性与对经济利益的倾向导致贸易过程中经常出现知识产权的不恰当垄断,成为知识产权损害文化多样性的主要表现形式。TRIPS协定的目标、权利保护规则、权利限制及权利滥用规则对于文化多样性价值目标的实现所具有的正面作用尚存在适用上的漏洞。《文化多样性公约》作为国际法有关文化发展的里程碑,其法律规范对于解释TRIPS协定的宗旨及确定TRIPS协定中例外规则的适用标准提供了可供选择的国际法依据,成为运用TRIPS协定以实现促进创新、繁荣文化的有益补充。The relationship between cultural diversity and intellectual property has gradually become a hot issue with the conflict between the aim of sustainable development and trade interests of intellectual property.Due to the determination of IP as an individual's property and the trend of economic interests,there often appears the improper monopoly caused by protecting IP in international trade,which is considered as the main expression of cultural diversity destroyed by intellectual property. The aim of TRIPS,the rules of rights protection,rights restriction and abuse rules can play positive roles in the process of realizing cultural diversity,but there are still flaws in the application. As the milestone of international law on culture,the Convention on Cultural Diversity may provide a considerable legal basis for interpreting the aim of TRIPS internationally and determining the application standard of exceptional rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28