检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马东骥[1] 段丽春[1] 李海梅[1] 曹伟[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第208医院妇产科,吉林长春130062
出 处:《继续医学教育》2015年第12期101-102,共2页Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨护理干预在介入治疗输卵管堵塞再通中的应用效果。方法将68例患者分为两组,对照组采用常规护理,观察组加强护理干预,对比两组治疗效果。结果观察组输卵管再通率为96.30%,高于对照组的78.18%;观察组妊娠率为47.06%,高于对照组的20.59%;观察组并发症发生率为2.94%,低于对照组的23.53%,对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论护理干预在介入治疗输卵管再通患者中的应用效果较好。Objective To investigate the nursing intervention in interventional treatment of tubal blockage and then pass the application results. Methods 68 patients were divided into two groups, the control group received usual care, nursing intervention to strengthen the observation group, compared two groups of treatment. Results The fallopian tube recanalization rate was 96.30%, higher than of 78.18%, observation group pregnancy rate was 47.06%, higher than the 20.59% in the observation group, complication rate was 2.94%, down from 23.53% in the control group, compared to a significant difference(P0.05). Conclusion Nursing interventions in interventional tubal recanalization patients application results are obvious.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145