区域政策重塑了经济地理吗？--空间中性与空间干预的视角  

Regional Policy Reshapes Economic Geography?A Perspective from Spatially - Neutral and Spatially - Targeted Approaches

作　　者：丁嵩[1,2] 孙斌栋[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心 [2]华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院

出　　处：《经济社会体制比较》2015年第6期56-67,共12页Comparative Economic & Social Systems

基　　金：华东师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育资助项目(项目编号:41471139);上海哲学社会科学规划课题(项目编号:2014BCK003)

摘　　要：通过回顾相关研究,文章认为,区域政策只有在考虑到人员以及地方双重依赖时才可能达到预期目的。空间中性与空间干预政策争论的本质在于是否承认空间均衡模型。鉴于现实世界往往并不存在空间均衡,空间干预政策便成为了次优的选择。然而,空间干预政策实施中的公平与效率目标经常是冲突的,很有可能陷入"零和游戏"。基于空间中性与空间干预的视角,文章提出了中国当前的区域政策选择。After analyzing relative literatures,this paper demonstrates that only by making policies that are both place- and people- based will a strong case for regional development intervention be made. Moreover,the difference between spatially- neutral and spatially- targeted policies is whether to admit spatial equilibrium model in essence. Considering that spatial equilibrium doesn＇t exist in reality,spatially- targeted interventions may be a second- best alternative. However,it is important to recognize the equity and efficiency goals of spatially- targeted policies can end up with conflict,in other words,the only result will be a zero- sum game. In the end,we put forward some alternatives for Chinese regional policies.

关 键 词：区域政策 空间中性 空间干预 空间均衡模型 

分 类 号：F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]