针灸治疗坐骨神经痛系统评价/Meta-分析的方法学质量及报告质量评价  被引量:1

Assessment of Methodological Quality and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews / Meta-analyses of Acupuncture for Sciatica

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:谭惠娟[1] 兰颖[1] 罗婷婷[1] 张瀚丹[2] 吴曦[1] 

机构地区:[1]成都中医药大学,四川成都610075 [2]成都市双流县中医医院,四川成都610200

出  处:《成都中医药大学学报》2015年第4期114-119,共6页Journal of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基  金:四川省科技厅项目(编号:2011SZ0080);四川省中医药管理局项目(编号:2010-05)

摘  要:目的:评价目前国内外针灸治疗坐骨神经痛的系统评价/Meta-分析的方法学质量和报告质量。方法:检索国内外大型医学数据库,依照纳入/排除标准进行严格筛选,分别采用AMSTAR量表和PRISMA清单对最终纳入的文献进行方法学质量评价和报告质量评价。结果:(1)纳入的8篇系统评价/Meta-分析,均存在不同程度的方法学质量问题,主要包括:所有研究均未提供纳入文献和排除文献清单报告;87.5%的研究缺少相关利益冲突报告;75%的研究未进行发表偏倚分析等。(2)报告质量方面,存在的主要问题包括:所有研究均未对结构式摘要、目的、方案和注册进行完整报告;75%的研究未对研究特征、其他分析进行完整报告;62.5%的研究未对研究理论基础、研究间偏倚、证据强度总结、资金支持进行完整报告等。结论:目前国内外针灸治疗坐骨神经痛的系统评价/Meta-分析质量参差不齐,需进一步提高方法学水平并规范报告,以期为循证决策提供高质量的证据。Objective: To assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of existing domestic and overseas systematic reviews/Meta-analyses of acupuncture for sciatica. Methods: Comprehensively retrieve large medical databases at home and abroad, conduct strict screening according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, and evaluate the methodological quality and reporting quality of in- cluded reviews respectively based on AMSTAR scale and PRISMA statement. Results: ( 1 ) There are more or less existing methodolog- ical quality problems in 8 included reviews. Mainly include : all the reviews didn' t provide the list of included and excluded studies, 87.5% were lack of the report of potential conflicts of interest, and 75% didn' t assess the likelihood of publication bias, etc. (2) As for reporting quality, main deficiencies include: none of literatures carried out intact report on structured summary, objectives, protocol and registration, 75% of literatures didn' t conduct intact report on study characteristics and additional analysis, and that 62.5% of literatures didn' t completely report on rationale, risk of bias among studies, summary of evidence and funding. Conclusion: At present the quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture for sciatica is uneven, which is asking for further improvement of methodology and standardization of reporting to provide high-quality evidence for evidence-based decision.

关 键 词:针灸疗法 坐骨神经痛 系统评价/Meta-分析 AMSTAR PRISMA 

分 类 号:R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R322.85[医药卫生—中医临床基础]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象