共同体视角下的旅游学术类型划分——继张凌云等人h指数测度成果的再探讨  

The Classification on Tourism Academic Type from Community Perspective : A Re-exploring of the Achievement of Professor Zhang's h Index

作　　者：宦震丹[1] 王艳平[2] 

机构地区：[1]湖州职业技术学院旅游与公共管理学院,浙江湖州313000 [2]东北财经大学旅游与酒店管理学院,辽宁大连116025

出　　处：《旅游学刊》2015年第12期101-108,共8页Tourism Tribune

摘　　要：张凌云等开启了学术共同体视角下旅游研究的新领域,其先后发表两篇文章,分别以论文数量、h指数为测度指标,对我国旅游学术共同体(学术期刊、学术机构及旅游研究者)的学术贡献进行了排序与评价。文章在其研究成果的基础上,通过对个体排序数据进行再分组,尝试了旅游学术共同体范畴内的类型划分工作。设计了可实现聚类效果的分列排序法,依据组内成员的名次排序与论文数量多少要保持一致的原则,通过对学者排序但却不改变总序号及相应论文数量的位置变动,最终得到了11种学术类型。虽然每种类型的内容特征还有待于今后进一步的深入研究,但结果已呈现出各组学术贡献的程度差异,不仅得出ABC三组学术贡献与论文数量的反序关系,更为有意义的是指出了D组作为一个整体的学术价值。Professor Zhang L.Y. etc. started a new field of tourism research, which was from the perspective of academic community. He had published two papers in succession about this topic. In these papers, he ranked and evaluated the academic contributions by tourism academic communities in China（academic journals, academic institutions and tourism researchers）, using the quantity of articles in the first paper and the h index in the second as criteria respectively. In the observation of h index ranking table, a contradictory phenomenon had been found, which was the fact that the ranking might not be higher in accordance with the growing quantity of papers published. On the basis of his research results, the authors of this paper used the method of re- grouping the original ranking data,tried to obtain the different academic types within the scope of tourism academic community.In order to realize the clustering effect expected, authors designed the group- ranking method and applied it to the available ranking table. The principle of this method was that keeping the consistency between member’s ranking and number of published papers in every group. If there was an inconsistency, then put it out of the original location to the other side, but the members who had been moved to another column do not change their order number. When the whole original column was checked from the top to bottom,the left ones were called A group. Afterwards, according to the rule,the new column that was the other side column would be grouped again until to the last member. By this method, 11 kinds of tourism academic types were categorized. From the individual ranking to the clustering group ranking, this was considered to be a meaningful change, and the method also had some other practical values for the study of tourism academic community. Among the 11 kinds of tourism academic types, the group C had the most members, accounting for 17.83% of the total sample, next was the group B, then the group A and D followed. The numbers of the other

关 键 词：旅游 学术共同体 类型划分 分列排序法 

分 类 号：F592[经济管理—旅游管理]