检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东临沂大学,山东临沂276005 [2]摩根士丹利,美国马里兰20783
出 处:《档案学研究》2015年第6期95-98,共4页Archives Science Study
摘 要:美国的个人信用体系经历了160多年的建设和发展,现已比较成熟完善;我国的个人信用档案建设起步较晚且正迅速发展,同时存在着诸多亟待完善的问题。本文通过中美个人信用档案起源、运行模式、信用档案意识、相关法律法规、登记及信息采集制度、监督奖惩体系建设等方面进行对比分析,学习借鉴美国的成功经验,为我国个人信用档案建设提供启示,以期推进我国个人信用档案的快速发展。The personal credit system in America has been established and developed for more than 160 years,and now is quite matured and completed. In contrast,the personal credit system in China just started but develops rapidly,while at the same time,it still exist some pressing problems. In this article,we will compare and analyze America and China's personal credit record from following aspects: the origins,operational mode,consciousness of credibility record,related laws and regulations,register and information acquisition institution,system of supervision rewards and penalties,so as to learn from America's experience as our inspiration,and improve the development of personal credit system development in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117