检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津大学管理与经济学部 [2]天津外国语大学国际商学院
出 处:《城市问题》2015年第12期12-18,共7页Urban Problems
基 金:教育部国家软科学研究计划项目(2011GXQ4B008)
摘 要:运用DEA-BCC模型测度了2003-2012年我国的城镇化效率,并对2012年我国的城镇化效率状况进行了投影分析。结果显示:在全国层面,城镇化技术效率和纯技术效率变化不大,规模效率呈现下降趋势;在区域层面,东中西三大区域间技术效率和纯技术效率表现出东高西低的格局,规模效率方面三区域差别不大;在省际层面,各省份之间技术效率差异较大,纯技术效率的差异是造成各省份之间效率差距的主要原因;投入冗余和产出不足的共存拉低了我国的城镇化技术效率。在此基础上,提出了提高我国城镇化效率的建议。Using DEA - BCC model, this essay meas- ures China' s urbanization efficiency from 2003 to 2012 and the projection analysis is carried out in 2012. The main results are as follows: At a national level, the technology efficiency and the pure technology efficiency change little, the scale efficiency shows a downward trend. At a regional level, the technology ef- ficiency and the pure technology of urbanization are getting slo- wer from the East to the West, and the scale efficiency has little difference from the East to the West. At a provincial level, there is a big difference among provinces, and the difference of pure technology efficiency is the main reason causing the efficiency gap between various provinces. The coexistence of input redun- dancy and output shortage cut down the technology efficiency of urbanization in China. Finally, this essay puts forward some suggestions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117