基于专家审稿意见的高被引和零被引论文学术质量差异性分析  

Analysis of academic quality difference between highly- and zero-cited papers

作　　者：徐晓芹[1] 刘晓燕[1] 李春花[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所<植物营养与肥料学报>编辑部,北京100081

出　　处：《编辑学报》2015年第6期564-566,共3页Acta Editologica

基　　金：2015年中国科协学术质量提升项目资助

摘　　要：选择《植物营养与肥料学报》2008—2012年发表的高被引和零被引论文,基于138份同行专家评审意见对这些论文原稿选题和论文质量的分析,阐明高被引与零被引论文内在特征的差异,总结高被引和零被引论文在写作方面存在的一些关键性问题。在此基础上,就编辑如何准确甄别和筛选具有较大学术影响力的稿件,拒绝学术质量差的稿件,抓住稿件退修的关键环节,督促作者落实专家审稿意见等提出建议。Based on the analysis of peer reviewers＇ comments,we firstly conducted a comparative study of the difference in topic selection and quality between the highly- and zero-cited papers published in Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer from 2008 to2012. In this paper,we summarize some key problems in the writing of highly- and zero-cited papers. Some suggestions are proposed for the editors on how to accurately identify and screen the manuscripts of great academic influence and refuse those manuscripts of poor quality, as wells as supervise the implementation of the reviewers＇ comments in manuscript retreat process.

关 键 词：论文学术质量 专家审稿意见 高被引和零被引论文 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]