检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学财税法研究所,北京100872
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第6期119-126,共8页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基 金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目(12SFB1005)
摘 要:诚信推定权是纳税人的基本权利之一,目前世界上许多发达国家都规定了纳税人的诚信推定权,但由于我国特定的历史、文化、治税方略等原因,该项权利在我国税法制度中并没有体现。借鉴他山之石,我国应当以修订《税收征收管理法》为契机,转变税收观念,正确处理征税权力和纳税权利的关系,明确规定纳税人的诚信推定权,限制税务机关检查权的边界,完善举证责任的分配,以落实诚实纳税推定权、推进税收法治。Presumption of Honesty is one of the basic rights of taxpayers and it has been established in many developed countries.For some historical,cultural and practical reasons,China has not included this right in tax system. However,the legislators could learn from other countries and take the chance of revising the Law on Administration of Tax Collection to change the concept of tax collection and to balance the power of tax administration and the rights of taxpayer.To realize rule of law in tax collection,China should establish the presumption of honesty rule explicitly,restrict the power of tax administration and improve the burden of proof.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222