歧义与多义——清末“排满”立论与接受的再考察  

Reinvestigation into the Anti-Manchu Theory and Its Acceptance

作　　者：瞿骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史系

出　　处：《史林》2015年第6期122-134,218,共13页Historical Review

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"清末民初现代国家观念的普及化研究(1895-1919)"(批准号:11CZS057);上海市浦江人才计划项目(批准号:11PJC043)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：20世纪最初十余年的"排满"是一个理念和事实互相绕缠、真相与幻象彼此交错的"以思想来造社会"的过程。排满立论的两大支柱——"夷夏之辨"和"东西洋学理"中充斥着歧义与多义,以致清末排满言论有着许多内在的紧张与复杂的层次;同时排满言论通过报刊及明末遗献等被大量阅读,但其阅读与接受的情形却绝非后设的"革命与改良"之争那样简单。看读者一方对"排满"言论多种多样的即时感受与评判,呈现出的历史面相非常丰富。In the first decade of the 20 th century,the Anti- Manchu campaign was full of the interaction of theories and facts,truth and visions that all aimed at changing the society. The ambiguous and various interpretations led to many complicated levels of the Anti- Manchu argument,which were widely read through newspapers,journals and literature. From the angle of the readers,they had different feelings when reading these argument that showed abundant historical phenomenon.

关 键 词：排满 夷夏之辨 东西洋学理 阅读 

分 类 号：K257[历史地理—历史学]