检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东金融学院社会保障研究所,广东广州510521
出 处:《当代经济管理》2016年第1期42-46,共5页Contemporary Economic Management
基 金:教育部人文社会科学项目<劳工过激维权行为的多元规避机制研究>(13YJC790215)
摘 要:不少研究将农民工的过激维权行为归因于其素质低下而出现的非理性行为。经济学分析表明,农民工维权行为是在当前维权环境下理性选择的结果。基于个人行为决策的角度,在高维权成本的环境下,稳健维权的预期回报率低,而过激维权尽管具有高风险的特征,但由于容易引起政府及媒体的介入,结果提高了维权的成功率和回报率。基于社会稳定的角度,过激维权却容易带来负面的社会影响。因此,必须采取干预措施以减少过激维权行为。政府可以采取的措施包括成立农民工合法权益保障基金,政府部门承担维权的最终责任,提高侵权者的侵权代价,降低稳健维权的成本,增加农民工组织维权的途径。Many studies claim that the radical rights-defending behaviors should be attributed to migrant workers comparative lower diathesis. How-ever, through economics analysis, these behaviors could be considered as rational option of migrant workers in current rights-defending environment. From personal behavior decision-making perspective, in an environment of high rights-defending cost, the expected return rate of robust rights-defending activities would be comparative low. While radical rights-defending behaviors possess the feature of higher-risk, it is easy to lead to interventions from the government and the media. As a result, the rate of success and return is high. On the other hand, from the social stability perspective, it is with high possibilities that radical rights-defending behaviors result in negative social influences Therefore, some interventions should be taken to reduce radical rights-defending behaviors. The government could take some measures, including establishing a migrant workers' legal rights protection fund, taking the ultimate responsibilities of migrant workers' rights defending, increasing the cost of infringements, decreasing the cost of robust rights-defending behaviors and providing more the routes of migrant workers' rights defending.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43