检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市职业安全健康研究院,上海200041 [2]澳门大学
出 处:《中国公共卫生管理》2015年第6期782-783,共2页Chinese Journal of Public Health Management
摘 要:鉴于目前中国职业病型医疗纠纷事件频发,产生了严重的社会负面影响,从职业病型医疗纠纷产生机理及对策两方面进行研究。结果发现职业病患者的"弱势效应"、职业病防治机构的"强势效应"、职业病诊疗救助机制的"缺位效应"以及大众媒体的"双刃剑"效应导致了职业病型医疗纠纷的频发。针对职业病型医疗纠纷产生机理,提出了对职业病患者的"关爱"策略、对职业病防治机构的"严管"策略、对职业病诊疗救助机制的"补位"策略以及"有效的媒体运用和舆情应对"策略。In view of medical disputes of occupational diseases with serious negative impacts on society frequentoccurrences, this article studied on the occurrence mechanism and countermeasures of occupation disease medical disputes.The results showed that "weak effect" of occupational diseases patients, "strong effect" of occupational disease preventionand control institutions, "absence effect" of occupational disease diagnosis, treatment and rescue mechanism, "double-edgedsword effect" of mass media caused the frequent occurrence of occupational medical disputes. To mechanism for occupationdisease medical disputes, the countermeasures are proposed: for "care" strategy for occupational disease patients; "strictmanagement" strategy for the institutions of occupation disease prevention and control; "remedy policy" strategy foroccupation disease diagnosis rescue mechanism; "effective use of media and response of public opinion" strategy.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117