检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁蕾[1] 吴小根[2] 马劲松[2] 钟士恩[1]
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学工商管理学院,中国江苏南京210023 [2]南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,中国江苏南京210023
出 处:《经济地理》2015年第12期209-215,共7页Economic Geography
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41271161);江苏省水利科技项目(2011046)
摘 要:在前期研究基础上,构建空间结构分析框架,以差异度、集聚度、连结度与通达度来考察南京市67个重点水体旅游资源单体,发现主城区资源的规模度、优越度均大于郊区,郊区在资源数量上明显多于主城区;最邻近点指数为1.024,基尼系数为0.2119,全市资源总体上为均匀型分布、集中程度较弱;β指数为2.194,γ指数为0.754,全市交通网络的连结度较好、节点之间的连通水平较好;通达度指数为67.99km,平均径路长为10.63,通达性较好的资源以主城区居多、较差的则以郊区为主;紧密度指数为0.50,全市区域相对紧凑,发展旅游交通具有良好的先天条件。Based on the previous research, this paper constructs the analysis framework of spatial structure, and investigates 67 key water tourism resources in Nanjing City from degrees of diversity, agglomeration, connection and accessibility, then finds that the scale and superior of the central downtown are better than that of the suburbs, while the suburbs have more resource quantity than that of the downtown; the index of the most proximal point is 1.024 and Gini coefficient is 0.2119; the resources are evenly distributed as a whole, so the concentrative degree is rather weak; ~ is 2.194 and Y is 0.754, with the transportation network well connecting the whole city, and the transportation among nodes fairly good; the accessibility index is 67.99km and the average path length is 10.63. The water tourism resources with better accessibility are mainly in the downtown, while worse ones are mostly in the suburbs. The closeness index is 0.50, and the city is relatively compact, therefore the city has good innate conditions for tourism development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.204.121