再论汉语是否存在完成动词  

Revisiting the(non-)existence of accomplishments in Chinese

作　　者：杨稼辉[1,2] 伍雅清[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学 [2]衡阳师范学院

出　　处：《现代外语》2015年第6期731-741,872,共11页Modern Foreign Languages

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"汉语生成类型学研究"(12BYY001);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目"英汉语完成情状对比研究"(13C080)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文讨论汉语是否存在完成动词。运用多种鉴别终结性的手段测试后发现,所谓的完成动词只有在带结果补语或量化解读的名词短语时,其引导的动词短语才具有终结性。在这两种情况下,典型活动动词引导的动词短语也具有终结性。由此可见,所谓的完成动词与活动动词在表达终结性这点上并无差异。基于此,我们认为汉语并不存在完成动词。This study addresses the issue of whether there exist accomplishments in Chinese. A set of diagnostics for telicity was conducted, yielding the following findings:(1) the so-called accomplishments in Chinese can give rise to telicity only when followed by resultative complements or noun phrases of quantificational interpretation; and(2) in either case, canonical activities can lead to telicity as well. Thus, the socalled accomplishments are found to be in parallel with activities with regard to telicity. The paper argues that there are no accomplishments in Chinese.

关 键 词：完成动词 终结性 定量化 结果补语 

分 类 号：H043[语言文字—语言学]