司法克制主义的法哲学基础溯源——以产品责任案件审理中的法律适用为视角  

Philosophy of Law for Judicial Passivism——From the Perspective of the Application of Law in Product Liability Cases

作　　者：梁亚[1] 赵存耀 

机构地区：[1]河北科技大学文法学院,河北石家庄050000 [2]河北省辛集市人民检察院,河北辛集052300

出　　处：《河北法学》2016年第1期60-67,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目<产品责任法中严格责任原则的反思与重置>(14FFX020);河北科技大学博士科研启动基金资助项目<严格责任在现代产品责任法中的地位研究>(QD201233)

摘　　要：英、法、德、日、美五国在19世纪末20世纪初的主流法哲学思潮均认为在适用法律的过程中,法官的自由裁量权受到严格的限制,法官只需进行对法律的逻辑把握,而不需进行价值判断,不需考虑适用的结果是否合理与公正。该理念对这一时期的法官适法产生了深刻影响。在产品责任案件中,法官对19世纪末20世纪初发生的巨大社会经济变化无动于衷,仍旧将19世纪自由资本主义阶段的法律规则固执地适用于垄断资本主义社会中,全然不顾变化了的社会经济状况已经丧失先前规则的适用基础。法官对于契约自由原则以及过错责任原则的坚持就是很好的例证。The mainstream philosophy of law held that judges should apply the law logically because their discretion was limited strictly. They did not need to make any value judgments and to care about whether the application was reasonable and just or not. The idea had a profound impact on the application of law by judges. In product liability cases, judges were indifferent to the great social and economic changes taking place at the end of 19th century and early of 20th century. They insisted on applying the rules of Laissez-faire capitalism to Monopoly capitalism. The changed social and economic condition was totally disregarded. The adherence to the principles of Freedom of Contract and Negligence by judges was good example.

关 键 词：法哲学 产品责任 法律适用 过错责任 契约自由 

分 类 号：DF529[政治法律—民商法学]