检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周平[1]
出 处:《江苏行政学院学报》2016年第1期88-96,共9页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"中国的边疆及边疆治理理论研究"(11&ZD122)的阶段性成果
摘 要:国家本身就是政治地理空间单位,因此,国家的治理必然地包涵着地理空间的谋划。回顾历史,中国在秦代便开始在国家治理中加入了政治地理空间的规划,此后,这样的地理空间规划一直以把疆域的边缘即边疆与核心区分开,采取不同方式治理,并在延续中逐步完善。今天,中国的地理空间环境发生了重大变化,国家的发展和治理已经处于一个前所未有的巨大地理空间场域中,传统的将边疆与核心区分别加以治理的地理空间规划已经不能适应形势发展的要求。因此,在推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的进程中,确立国家治理体系的地理空间维度,加强地理空间的谋划,不仅十分必要而且显得十分紧迫。State itself is a political geographical and spatial unit, therefore, state governance necessarily involves the planning of geographical space. Historically, China began to input planning of political geographical space in state govern- ance since the Qin Dynasty. Since then, this practice of planning has distinguished between the edges of territory ( namely frontiers ) from the core areas and adopted different ways of governance, which had been gradually improved in its continua- tion. Today, China's geospatial and spatial environment has undergone major changes, and the nation's development and governance has already been positioned in an unprecedentedly huge geospatial field, so the traditional distinction between the frontier and the core areas can no longer meet the requirements of the current situation. Therefore, in promoting the modernization of national governance system and governance competence, it is an urgent task to establish the geospatial di- mension of national governance system, and to strengthen the planning of geographical space.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28