被问责官员复出:制度安排、现实状况与争议焦点  

Reappointment of Penalized Officials:Institutional Arrangements,Reality and Focus of Disputes

作　　者：朱光喜[1] 金东日[1] 陶友宾 

机构地区：[1]桂林理工大学人文社会科学学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《江苏行政学院学报》2016年第1期114-120,共7页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"地方政府责任与问责制研究:组织和政策过程视角"(13YJA810005);广西高校科研项目"广西市县党政领导任期制现状及其对政策稳定的影响"(KY2015YB131)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：随着行政问责制度的不断完善,官员因问责而去职已成为常态,而与此相关的是被问责官员的复出。在制度安排上,被问责官员的复出存在相应的法规政策规定,但其完善性和合理性存在缺陷。在现实中,被问责官员的复出在一定程度上遵循了制度规定,但也存在违规违纪现象,存在由于制度本身的不完善难以判断是否违规的环节。这些问题引起了社会的不满和对于被问责官员是否可以复出以及应该如何复出的争议。从国家治理角度看,被问责官员的合理复出需要完善并严格执行系统的制度安排,更需改革与此相关的体制机制。With the continuous improvement of administrative accountability system, it has become a normal arrangement for officials to be removed of their positions as a result of the accountability process. It has given birth to a related issue ： the re- appointment of these penalized officials. In terms of institutional arrangements, there are corresponding laws, rules and pohcies for their reappointment, yet the completeness and reasonable nature are to be improved. In reality, the reappointmont of these penalized officials followed relevant laws, rules and policies to some extent, yet the phenomenon of default still exists, because it is difficult to determine whether certain practice is illegal due to the incompleteness of the institution itself. These problems have led to social discontent and disputes over whether these penalized officials should be reappointed and how. From the point of view of state governance, the government should improve the institutions and strictly enforce the laws and rules for the reasonable reap- pointment of penalized officials. It is also necessary to reform related institutions and mechanisms.

关 键 词：行政问责 官员复出 制度安排 现实状况 国家治理 

分 类 号：D035.2[政治法律—政治学]